This proposal recommends consolidating legacy multisig accounts into a simplified six-Safe structure, this is a follow-on proposal from TIP-52. The aim is to simplify the multisig structure and ensure each is aligned to a core financial function of Treasure DAO. The goal is to bring clarity, operational efficiency, and structure to how funds are allocated, managed, and reported. Multisigs will be deployed on Ethereum Mainnet and if/when Treasure goes multi-chain, these multisigs will also be deployed on these chains under the same address where appropriate.
Safe Name Purpose Treasury Core DAO reserves and long-term capital management Ecosystem Fund Ecosystem growth, strategic investments, and partner initiatives Contributor Contributor vesting compensation and grants Operations Routine expenses across DAO functions (infrastructure, tooling, Payroll etc.) Revenue Revenue flows generated from existing marketplace activity and future revenue activities Liquidation Fund Capital set aside for managing runway, covering downside scenarios, and backstopping protocol risks
Over time, Treasure DAO created multiple function-specific multisigs to support operational decentralization. While effective early on, this structure has become overly complex and administratively burdensome. By consolidating into six clearly defined buckets, the DAO can:
Existing Safe Destination Safe Treasury Treasury DA Staking Ecosystem Fund Liquidity Treasury Community Grants Treasury Smol Treasury Treasury Operations Operations Marketplace Revenue GBS Treasury Treasury Bridgeworld Treasury Magicswap Treasury Mage Treasury *It should be noted that some of these multi-sigs still have funds on arbitrum, wewill actively be bridging these assets back to mainnet in order to consolidate operations.
Safe Name Rationale Ecosystem Fund Retained as a standalone Safe for funding strategic ecosystem initiatives Contributor Maintained for contributor vesting Liquidation Fund Newly created safe dedicated to liquidation of Treasure if the business becomes no longer viable
Treasure DAO currently maintains 11 safes for organizational purposes. Over time, this structure has become unwieldy and inefficient. Each time a contributor departs, a significant amount of time is spent updating multisigs and internal documentation—time that could be better spent on development and operations. In many cases, multisigs were created for programs that are now inactive or effectively retired. For example, neither Community Grants nor DA Staking are currently relevant. This outdated structure makes it harder to present an accurate picture of the DAO’s available MAGIC or USDC reserves to the community. The onboarding process for new administrators has also become increasingly burdensome, requiring a deep understanding of legacy initiatives just to navigate the current treasury architecture. Ironically, while the original intent behind separating funds was to improve transparency and accountability, the result has been the opposite: the complex web of accounts has made it more difficult for the community to clearly understand the DAO’s financial state. We propose a simpler, more intuitive approach: business units or verticals will continue to be tracked and reported independently, but the DAO will retain just six core multisigs — Treasury, Ecosystem Fund, Contributor, Operations, Revenue, and Liquidation Fund.
This consolidation reflects a natural progression in Treasure DAO’s maturation — reducing complexity and aligning treasury infrastructure with strategic planning needs. It lays the foundation for an upgraded tokenomics model, improved accountability, and long-term sustainability across all DAO initiatives.
Author: Elliott (Regen Financial)