The purpose of this proposal is to suggest an unshETH Whitelisting Proposal (UWP) introduction, voting, and implementation process that would enable Liquid Staking Token protocol teams to request to be added to the unshETH Index.
This is a proposal of a formal process for introducing, voting, and implementing UWPs. Rather than relying on the standard UIP process.
Should this be approved by a DAO vote and implemented, proposals will voted on at the end of each UWP governance Epoch. Valid UWP proposals are to be discussed for at least 7 days on unshETH’s governance forum. They must be posted 14 days before the end of an Epoch to be considered. Should more than 2 UWP proposals meet the criteria for voting during any given Epoch a “runoff” Snapshot will be conducted, the 2 most popular UWP proposals will be voted on via subsequent individual Snapshot votes. In order for a UWP vote to pass it must have a super-majority support (> 66.66%) after at least five days of voting. Following a successful vote, necessary changes will be implemented by unshETH protocol team and signed by the multi-sig, if necessary. Changes to this policy, including quorum requirements or what constitutes a majority vote, can only be enacted by a valid UIP that overwrites this policy.
This UIP defines and formalizes the governance proposal process in order for proposals to be valid and binding, and reduce any confusion in the UWP introduction and voting process.
Introducing UWP Epochs & Voting
In order to submit a potential UWP for voting a user must first create a thread for the proposal on the unshETH governance forum.
No poll is required to be included. A thread which been on the governance forum for at least 7 days prior to the start of the Epoch’s voting period can proceed to voting via Snapshot. This allows the community to suggest potential changes to the proposal before it moves to the formal voting phase on Snapshot. Please do not assign your proposal a UWP number; numbers will be assigned by moderators prior to a vote taking place.
If a proposal was introduced on the governance forum but either did not get selected for voting or did not get successfully passed via Snapshot vote, the author of the proposal may re-submit the proposal to the governance forum and restart the process in the following Epoch. This ensures that proposals that previously received support from governance still retain support from the community.
Snapshot is used for formal, binding votes. A moderator of the unshETH governance forum will create the Snapshot proposal.
There will be a voting window of 6 days. In order for a vote to pass it needs to have a super majority approval (>66.66%) by eligible voters. If the Snapshot vote does not meet a 66.66% majority approval then the vote is rejected. Authors of proposals that are rejected may resubmit their proposal, but should include significant changes that address issues that may have prevented the UWP from passing during the initial vote. If an LST protocol fails to pass two consecutive votes it must wait two governance epochs before its next attempt.
Snapshot may still be used for informal signal voting, including community contests, but its primary purpose will be to conduct formal, binding votes.
For: Formalize the UWP introduction, voting, and implementation processes as specified above
Against: Do not formalize these processes. No changes made.
Author Harpe is an independent contributor to the unshETH protocol, pursuing growth of the unshETH protocol through collaboration with other DeFi teams and DAOs. Harpe is not a member of the protocol development team.