Should our Kaijus stay in the DAO wallet or move to the fractional.art vault?

Option I: We keep the Kaijus in the DAO wallet.

Pros

o The Kaijus generate roughly enough $RWASTE to produce a baby Kaiju every 10 days, this can add value to the wallet which the DAO can utilise, we can then add the Kaijus to the fractionalised vault after they support token claiming. We will make a statement that once the vault supports token claiming, then the Kaijus will be in the vault immediately aiming to increase confidence in the project. This could maximise utility from the Kaijus and boost the performance of the DAO and $FLESH.

Cons

o We could potentially lose prospective value to the token causing a slight loss in credibility to prospective buyers of CryptoZombiez. The Kaijus aren’t directly in the vault. This potential loss in confidence could affect sales and price of the Zombiez due to loss of confidence in the token.

Option II: We transfer the Kaijus to the fractional.art vault.

Pros

o $FLESH token is directly supported by our Kaijus visually that are fractionalised bringing more ‘intrinsic value’ to the token itself. o The fractionalisation of the Kaijus would bring more stability and confidence to outsiders looking into the project.The increase in confidence in the project could potentially stimulate an increase in volume that would outweigh the $RWASTE production for the DAO wallet. Note that when staking is implemented that could stimulate a large increase in volume and price also.

Cons

o $RWASTE may potentially be claimable in the future, we have no timeline. In the meantime, the Kaijus would not generate $RWASTE until fractional.art can implement token emission claiming, they have confirmed this will be available in the future. O Placing the Kaijus in the fractional.art vault only changes visual representation, the Kaijus have their value wherever they are stored, and the DAO wallet provides more utility for them. For example, CyberKongz do not have a fractional.art vault and maintain high confidence.